3 ms·
People may be altruistic, but in a company setting they may have no possibility for altruism. CEO decisions influence property of others (the shareholders) so h
by avodonosov 2y ago
People may be altruistic, but in a company setting they may have no possibility for altruism. CEO decisions influence property of others (the shareholders) so he can not freely pursue altruistic goals.
I heard that Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. was an important precedent in the US.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.
- owisd 2y agoThese days the courts give wide latitude to companies to offer virtually any plausible reason why superficially altruistic acts are in fact good long term for shareholder value. Anyone wanting to do what Ford did just needs to keep their mouth shut about the real reasons.
- avodonosov 2y agoInteresting. Do you know any particular court cases? My wikipedia link above in turn links to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_primacy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_primacy, which says in the last paragraph: "The doctrine waned in later years." This probably confirms what you say, but I'd be interested to learn about specific cases.