25 ms·
You don't have to pontificate on semantics, you can just see the list of sites that receive the most takedown links: http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/r
by magicalist 14y ago
You don't have to pontificate on semantics, you can just see the list of sites that receive the most takedown links:
http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/domains/?r=all-time http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/...
that list does correlate rather well with spammy content (stuffed links and lots of flash ads and popups), it just also happens to correlate well with sites you're looking for when you want a torrent. As long as they're still indexing these sites, they're probably still going to come up if you add "torrent" to your query, so I don't really see the problem.
The reality is, when most people are looking for a video, they are looking to find it on an official site, and not a streaming video site from china or a torrent site with 18 "download" buttons, none of which links to the actual torrent file download (it's in the plain text link). As long as they can still find the other content, you're still meeting everyone's needs and you've probably upped average searcher satisfaction.
Now, geographic restrictions on video playback would be a great search signal to incorporate (would googlebot start trying to play videostreams, though?). That shit is really annoying.
- barista 14y agoDoes this account for takedown notices received by youtube by itself? No.