I agree that the potential consequences of a breach would be significantly greater with robots than with human soldiers. Most of the wars I'm aware about durin

I agree that the potential consequences of a breach would be significantly greater with robots than with human soldiers. Most of the wars I'm aware about during the past few decades have been highly asymmetric technologically or have been between technologically limited forces. In the first case the likelihood is that only the more technologically advanced force would utilise robots and would be able to secure them beyond the capabilities of the technologically inferior opposing force to compromise. In the second case neither side is likely to have robots fighting. If this trend holds true for the future then 'warbots' are going to be increasingly used.