> Otherwise, I think simple, procedural programming is generally a better default paradigm. I think this is almost the opposite conclusion from the one TFA (an

> Otherwise, I think simple, procedural programming is generally a better default paradigm. I think this is almost the opposite conclusion from the one TFA (and in particular the longer form article linked elsewhere here), which is more like: most standard imperative programming is bad and standard (pure) FP is at least slightly better, but people generally don't draw the right conclusions about how to apply FP lessons to imperative languages.