3 ms·
You're punching your fist into the air because the contract is not in a form you'd like. In the same judgements, judges go on to either call, or quote the call
by ty6853 2y ago
You're punching your fist into the air because the contract is not in a form you'd like. In the same judgements, judges go on to either call, or quote the calling of the facility as a 'contract' facility after establishing the contract agreement.
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoJust to refresh for anyone reading along: > The contract between the two countries is only for 1 year Ty's red herrings about court filings and so on are just that: red herrings. All sources lead back to exactly one piece of information, which is an AP article about a memo from El Salvador about an agreement. That AP article claims the memo says the following: "El Salvador confirms it will house these individuals for one (1) year, pending the United States’ decision on their long term disposition" That's it. It does not say "only" for one year. There is no information about the renewal terms. There is no information about what happens after one year. No one has produced the full set of terms of this agreement, and no one has produced evidence (as is required under US law) that an actual signed contract even exists (as is required under US law). Readers can assess that how they wish.