4 ms·
If you want to maintain the properties that SQLite has for read use cases, you'll need to replicate a couple of features. At the very least, you'll probably wan
by jchw 2y ago
If you want to maintain the properties that SQLite has for read use cases, you'll need to replicate a couple of features. At the very least, you'll probably want the format to still be page-based with a BTree structure. You really could get away with just using the SQLite format if you didn't mind the weirdness; a functional SQLite parser that can read tables would not be a significant amount of code. I think, though, that if you want to read the schema as SQLite understands it, you'd need to interpret the CREATE TABLE syntax, which would make it a bit more complex for sure. Otherwise, you can read tables and columns themselves relatively easily, and the values are all stringified.
- hinkley 2y agoYeah if I wasn’t clear I’m talking about a minimal file that SQLite can still open read only without errors, not a third party implementation. Though there might be a few tweaks that would allow SQLite to be a bit more lenient. For instance missing metadata that can be assumed. Maybe b tree nodes exceeding the usual load factor.