I wonder if anyone on SCOTUS who decided to absolve Trump for any "official acts" has figured out the whole "absolute power corrupts absolutely" thing? or if th

I wonder if anyone on SCOTUS who decided to absolve Trump for any "official acts" has figured out the whole "absolute power corrupts absolutely" thing? or if they maybe a little bit think they maybe made a mistake... >But a top U.S. immigration official said in another filing on Sunday that the order barring Abrego Garcia's removal to El Salvador was no longer valid "because of his membership in MS-13 which is now a designated foreign terrorist organization." Because he had a Bulls hat, and some informant claimed he was a member of a gang in a city he never lived in. I think SCOTUS assumes some level of participation and honesty from people who have no intent of doing so.