GP glancing at the pseudo-code is certainly an efficient way to dismiss an article, but something tells me he missed the crucial sentence in the abstract: >"We

GP glancing at the pseudo-code is certainly an efficient way to dismiss an article, but something tells me he missed the crucial sentence in the abstract: >"We believe this work takes a first step TOWARDS introducing a new family of GRADIENT-FREE learning methods" I.e. for the time being, authors can't convince themselves not to take advantage of efficient hw for taking gradients (*Checks that Oxford University is not under sanctions*)