Wikipedia has citations so you can verify its information. An LLM with citations can also be verified, and if the citations are consistently accurate people wil

Wikipedia has citations so you can verify its information. An LLM with citations can also be verified, and if the citations are consistently accurate people will start to trust it. Wikipedia has a very dedicated fact-checking team who try to enforce accuracy, and (at least for non-political articles) most agree they do very well. Perhaps someone will develop a reliable automated fact-checker, then it can be applied to LLM output to “bless” it or point out the mistakes.