3 ms·
Putting aside this particular topic, I'm seeing posts talking negatively about the language. I got my feet wet with Go many many years ago and for unknown reaso
by liendolucas 2y ago
Putting aside this particular topic, I'm seeing posts talking negatively about the language. I got my feet wet with Go many many years ago and for unknown reasons I never kept digging on it, so...
Is it worth learning it? What problems are best solved with it?
- jtolds 2y agoAuthor of the post here, I really like Go! It's my favorite language! It has absolutely nailed high concurrency programming in a way that other languages' solutions make me cringe to think through (await/async are so gross and unnecessary!) If you are intending to do something that has multiple concurrent tasks ongoing at the same time, I would definitely reach for Go (and maybe be very careful or skip entirely using channels). I also would reach for Go if you intend to work with a large group of other software engineers. Go is rigid; when I first started programming I thought I wanted maximum flexibility, but Go brings uniformity to a group of engineers' output in a way that makes the overall team much more productive IMO. Basically, I think Go is the best choice for server-side or backend programming, with an even stronger case when you're working with a team.
- liendolucas 2y agoThanks for the tip! Will definitely take into account your insights on channels if I decide to dive into it.
- jtolds 2y agoI have written channel code in the last week. It's part of the deal (especially with the context package). I'm just happy to see them restrained.