In the EUCD, a copy in RAM falls under copyright, but there is an exception defined (art 5) if the copy is transitory and the target use is legal under copyrigh

In the EUCD, a copy in RAM falls under copyright, but there is an exception defined (art 5) if the copy is transitory and the target use is legal under copyright. Neither is true for AI, so this article is probably wrong in the EU. Apart from that, I wonder uf an AI is learning in the legal sense of the word. I'd suspect removing copyright trough learning is something only humans can do, seen trough legal glasses. An AI would be a mechanical device creating a mashup of multiple works, and be a derived work of all of them. Main problem with this rebuttal is how you prove the AI copied your work specifically, and finding out which of the zillions of creative works in that mashup are owned by who.