4 ms·
I would be more inclined to use it if there was offline support and it wasn't so expensive. I used (and really really like) Logseq for awhile but have since mov
by packetlost 2y ago
I would be more inclined to use it if there was offline support and it wasn't so expensive. I used (and really really like) Logseq for awhile but have since moved to Obsidian. I'd switch if there was a strong reason to.
- fmos 2y agoWhy and how did you switch from Logseq to Obsidian?
- fredoliveira 2y agoI'm not the parent commenter, but made a similar transition (years ago at this point). I have always loved outliner formats, but the obsidian ecosystem is quite strong, and because I already had thousands of notes that were just plain old markdown, it was a more natural home. I wrote code to facilitate the migration. Nothing too crazy, but in general I wrote scripts that: - Add lines between logseq's daily notes format and the rest of the content - Moving daily notes to month-based subfolders - Automatically adding frontmatter to files that didn't have any - Removing indentation when unnecessary - Covert everything to space-based indentation rather than tabs
- packetlost 2y agoBugs and performance mostly. The elusive database refactor might bring me back but we'll see. I definitely have a preference for outliner, flat zk style, but I'm able to get the majority of the benefit from Obsidian while having access to a stronger ecosystem of plugins and first class publishing and syncing support. Meanwhile Logseq seems to have lost a lot of steam.