3 ms·
> It's fine provided that the link from the equipment that feeds it data is optically isolated to only go in one direction. Then people get two of them, one fo
by Animats 2y ago
> It's fine provided that the link from the equipment that feeds it data is optically isolated to only go in one direction.
Then people get two of them, one for each direction.[1] Can someone explain why this is supposed to be secure? It's apparently a real product.
[1] https://owlcyberdefense.com/product/recon-2u/ https://owlcyberdefense.com/product/recon-2u/
- fc417fc802 2y agoWut? That reads like satire. The equipment is inside the security boundary, the LAN is outside. What is the purpose of enforcing one-way control signals when the thing sending the control signals is by necessity within the same security boundary as the destination for those signals? I want to extend the benefit of the doubt and assume my own ignorance but I'm really struggling with this one.
- mppm 2y agoAmazing. Maybe I should pitch them my idea of MIL-spec acoustic relays for communicating with air-gapped facilities?