> or to make a moral argument that some kind of misappropriation is occurring. They can also make a legal argument that the training set will fully reproduce c

> or to make a moral argument that some kind of misappropriation is occurring. They can also make a legal argument that the training set will fully reproduce copyrighted work. Which is just an actual crime as well as being completely amoral. > because then it exists and they have to compete with it The entire point of copyright law is: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." Individual artists should not have to "compete" against a billion dollar corporation which freely engages in copyright violations that these same artists have to abide by.