>> Some 60% of the claims weren’t reimbursed at all. >The article gives examples of very normal billing errors that were used as the pretext for this. Are you

>> Some 60% of the claims weren’t reimbursed at all. >The article gives examples of very normal billing errors that were used as the pretext for this. Are you talking about this blurb? "Blue Cross did not accuse the center of any intentional miscoding — but the sloppy billing led to additional scrutiny, the company’s witnesses said. " I'm not sure what the alternative is. Are they supposed to pay even though the are errors? Are they saying, "you only have one chance to file a claim, and there's a typo in it so we won't reimburse you a dime?". It's not clear from the article why exactly they're denying the claim, aside from maybe the place being overpriced.