2 ms·
I can have cline control and terminal command, it's by no means limited to editing code. On the flip side, if you do edit codey it can lean in the LSP and vario
by danielbln 2y ago
I can have cline control and terminal command, it's by no means limited to editing code. On the flip side, if you do edit codey it can lean in the LSP and various other IDE diagnostics to produce better code more efficiently.
Claude Code is pretty great, but I find Cline better (plus I can use Gemini 2.5 with it and am not limited to Anthropic only).
- koakuma-chan 2y agoMaybe Cline isn’t inherently limited to coding, but you still have to open VSCode. Whereas I often use Claude Code for things that have nothing to do with text editing, for example dealing with ffmpeg.
- koakuma-chan 2y agoI doubt that LSP and IDE diagnostics are better than running your compiler (e.g. tsc) and looking at the output, which Claude Code does.
- danielbln 2y agoWell, that might be alright for Typescript, less so for Python. Of course, Claude Code can run the linters and type checkers manually, the IDE just does it without the extra LLM call.
- koakuma-chan 2y agoIf it’s alright for typescript then it’s also alright for python because running tsc is equivalent to running whatever python type checker you use, but yes, there may be some overhead because Claude Code has to decide to run your compiler/type checker.