3 ms·
>it was not supposed to secretly mean “lol we have no intention of paying for this ever”, but they used it that way. Are you talking about the "Targeted Provid
by gruez 2y ago
>it was not supposed to secretly mean “lol we have no intention of paying for this ever”, but they used it that way.
Are you talking about the "Targeted Provider List"? The article says:
>The blocked list meant that each bill from the center received a manual scrub by payment specialists before reimbursement.
That's not the same as “lol we have no intention of paying for this ever”.
- ceejayoz 2y agoAnd “manual scrub”, in practice, meant “find any reason to deny”. > Some 60% of the claims weren’t reimbursed at all. The article gives examples of very normal billing errors that were used as the pretext for this. It’s very clear they knew they didn’t want to pay the claims. Even in advance of the procedures. > Then, a week or so before her surgery, Arch was wrangling child care and meal plans when she got a call from the insurer. The representative on the line was trying to persuade her to have the surgery elsewhere. She urged Arch to seek a hospital that, unlike the center, was in network and charged less.
- gruez 2y ago>> Some 60% of the claims weren’t reimbursed at all. >The article gives examples of very normal billing errors that were used as the pretext for this. Are you talking about this blurb? "Blue Cross did not accuse the center of any intentional miscoding — but the sloppy billing led to additional scrutiny, the company’s witnesses said. " I'm not sure what the alternative is. Are they supposed to pay even though the are errors? Are they saying, "you only have one chance to file a claim, and there's a typo in it so we won't reimburse you a dime?". It's not clear from the article why exactly they're denying the claim, aside from maybe the place being overpriced.