4 ms·
The volunteers were great, but not perfect. They needed to be more selective about which roles the volunteers were capable of handling. This story comes to mind
by chevas 14y ago
The volunteers were great, but not perfect. They needed to be more selective about which roles the volunteers were capable of handling. This story comes to mind: http://1045theteam.com/american-tv-neglected-the-saddest-story-in-the-olympics/ http://1045theteam.com/american-tv-neglected-the-saddest-sto...
The timekeeper should not have been a 15 year old kid.
- shurane 14y agoI would like to say that age is not indicative of capabilities. That could have just as likely happened to a 25 year old or 65 year old.
- chevas 14y agoI disagree. I think there are more capable 15 year-olds than others and it's not a comprehensive indicator, but brain development is not complete at that age and therefore having an adequate attention span to competently time keep is arguably more difficult to secure from a 15 year old than a 25 year old.
- ghurlman 14y agoThe timekeeper should not have been a human at all.