3 ms·

> if we define “AI” as something completely oblivious of the past, it would be a great disservice. > as lossy storage well that would just be a great misunde

• Jensson 2y ago
  > well that would just be a great misunderstanding of what "learning" is. You need to assume a malicious actor here, its trivial to use an AI as lossy storage, if that is legal copyright washing then large corporations will do so at industrial scale.
  • mdp2021 2y ago
    > its trivial to use an You mean, "a Neural Network as function approximator for the reproduction of texts". But in fact, AI cannot be confused with that idea - and be it AI ("system for the replacement of a professional"), or AGI ("system implementing intelligence"), or LLM (which can only be useful as "system with emergent properties from text generation"), "learning" is strongly opposite to "memorizing" (as would be evident in a student - trivial example, one that would memorize a multiplication but be unable to perform it). So, that somebody places a sticker on his apparel to fake a profession for «malicious act[ion]» cannot make us forget the real thing: "learning" is what is sought, and for learning we need the teaching material. ...Which, societally, is rightly decided as free (i.e. stored in libraries).