4 ms·
There clearly is a point when a compressed jpeg becomes a transformation, even if the precise point is ambiguous. Take 'The Bee Movie at 3000% speed except whe
by Retr0id 2y ago
There clearly is a point when a compressed jpeg becomes a transformation, even if the precise point is ambiguous.
Take 'The Bee Movie at 3000% speed except when they say "bee"', for example - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7apltfVJBwU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7apltfVJBwU. It hasn't been taken down for over 5 years so I'm going to assume it's considered acceptable/transformational use.
Personally, I'd say what matters is whether you'd plausibly use the transformed/compressed version as a drop-in substitute for the original. ChatGPT can probably reproduce the complete works of shakespeare verbatim if prompted appropriately, but is anyone seriously going to read it that way?
- basch 2y agoAgreed. So not EVERY LLM is automatically copying in principle, but most of the current implementations probably retain TOO MUCH of the original sources to NOT be copies.
- kemotep 2y agoDo you know that YouTube hasn’t reassigned the video’s ad revenue to the IP holder and the IP holder hasn’t requested it be taken down because they now receive compensation for it from YouTube?