3 ms·
“If humans were somehow required to have an explicit license to learn from work, it would be the end of individual creativity as we know it“ What about text bo
by techpineapple 1y ago
“If humans were somehow required to have an explicit license to learn from work, it would be the end of individual creativity as we know it“
What about text books, in order to train on a textbook, I have to pay a licensing fee.
- Ylpertnodi 1y ago>What about text books, in order to train on a textbook, I have to pay a licensing fee. Would that also apply if you bought the text books second-hand (or were given it)?
- Ekaros 1y agoFirst sale doctrine applies in those cases. That is original buyer can transfer the license that is sell the book. With AIs I think it is clear it would fall under some other limitations like you cannot broadcast CD over radio. And with movies not start movie theatre and play movies without paying creators...
- pitaj 1y agoIf you pirate a text book, learn from it, and then apply that knowledge to write your own textbook: your textbook would not be a copyright violation of the original, even though you "stole" the original.
- mdp2021 1y ago> I have to pay Fortunately, others have libraries. There is no need to pay for the examination of material stored in libraries (and similar).
- realharo 1y agoEven if you accept the premise, what does it matter? AI are not humans. Laws were made up by people at a specific time for a specific purpose. Obviously our existing laws are "designed" around human limitations. As for future laws, it's just a matter of who is powerful and persuasive enough to push through their vision of the future.