3 ms·
That's a lot of words to justify what I presume to be the author's pre-existing viewpoint. Given that "training" on someone else's IP will lead to a regurgitat
by EdwardDiego 2y ago
That's a lot of words to justify what I presume to be the author's pre-existing viewpoint.
Given that "training" on someone else's IP will lead to a regurgitation of some slight permutation of that IP (e.g., all the Studio Ghibli style AI images), I think the author is pushing shit up hill with the word "can't".
- seanhunter 2y agoYup. Nothing quite like someone who clearly has no legal background trying to use first principles reasoning + bullshit to make a quasi-legal argument that justifies their own prior opinion.
- mdp2021 2y ago> Given that "training" on someone else's [would] lead to a regurgitation of some slight permutation That is not necessary. It may happen with "bad" NNs.