3 ms·
With a few exceptions for companies with highly secretive data, you do have to be a government agency or working in a highly regulated government-adjacent area
by connicpu 2y ago
With a few exceptions for companies with highly secretive data, you do have to be a government agency or working in a highly regulated government-adjacent area for secured private clouds to be a requirement carved in stone and therefore worth investing a ton of extra money into though.
- reaperducer 2y agoJust off the top of my head: Healthcare. Banking.
- surajrmal 2y agoBoth of which are encumbered with regulations that want them to need this.
- SoftTalker 2y agoNeither approaches the secrecy needed by government installations. Health care and banking leak PII regularly and never really suffer any consequences.
- trc001 2y agoThis is just inaccurate
- DakotaR 1y agohttps://circlesofcaredatasettlement.com/ https://circlesofcaredatasettlement.com/
- reaperducer 1y agoAnecdotes are not data.
- kube-system 2y agoHealthcare and banking have no issue storing data in third party datacenters as long as they meet the applicable standards.
- vel0city 2y agoYou absolutely don't need this or FedRAMP to do healthcare.
- dhorthy 2y agoi'll add that on-prem is getting 10-100x easier than it was 10-20 years ago (still very hard), and "i want to run this in my own datacenter" is becoming accessible to much smaller companies than just F500 enterprises
- kortilla 2y agoHuh? 20 years ago on-prem was the norm and the cloud didn’t exist.
- tuukkah 2y agoYeah, AWS was in private beta in 2005 and public in 2006. People knew it existed but didn't have access yet. https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-amazon-exposed-its-guts-the-history-of-awss-ec2/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-amazon-exposed-its-guts-th...