3 ms·
Whataboutism does not change anything about it being a weak spot. I’m only saying the free speech west can’t use the same tactic against these kind of adversari
by baq 2y ago
Whataboutism does not change anything about it being a weak spot. I’m only saying the free speech west can’t use the same tactic against these kind of adversaries because they’re insulated against them.
- Retric 2y agoFree speech including paid speech isn’t really a knock on free speech. Someone can be persuaded by an argument they heard once, but can’t per persuaded by an argument they never hear. Thus blocking speech by preventing any kind of speech including paid speech is problematic.
- baq 2y agoI’m saying ‘free speech is an obvious weakness’, not ‘we should disallow free speech’. Very different things.
- Retric 2y agoHaving outside actors in the conversation is a strength.
- monetus 2y agoThe contention is that they in particular aren't good faith actors unlike other outside actors, iiuc.
- Retric 2y agoBad faith actors are also beneficial. Kids who grow up watching commercials start distrusting them. Free speech is not about any one issue but all topics. In many ways curating so people see the kinds of things they agree with is vastly more harmful than propaganda.
- Braxton1980 2y agoWhat happens when people are tol 1. Don't trust the media 2. Don't trust the opposition 3. Don't trust the experts Doesn't this lead to a situation where only bad actors exist? It people are so savy because of advertising why did tens of millions believe the election was stolen?
- Retric 2y ago> What happens when people are… Everyone doesn’t fit those criteria. Motivated reasoning exists with and without propaganda. The specific words used may end up mimicking “a message,” but you can find millions of disgruntled people after any election. There’s a great deal of talk around how much social media etc changed the landscape but American politics looks basically the same before and after Facebook.
- Braxton1980 2y ago>American politics looks basically the same before and after Facebook. Trump and MAGA Republicans lie more openly than traditional Republicans. American politics are not the same. Here's an easy exercise. This is a post from MGT. Show me anything even close to this insane from an elected person in high office (house, senate, president) in the last 50 years https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/styles/scale_w1024/s3/static/D8Image/2021/01/27/marjorietaylorgreene-campfire.png?itok=NbipA3UY https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/styles/scale_w1024/s3/st...
- Retric 2y agoThat’s fairly mild, but it’s not so easy to link to 20+ year old clips. There’s some real bangers of homophobic rants in your time frame, but you may be a little young to remember any of them. In terms of lies here’s one that was a central tenant of the part of the party line for decades. Social security isn’t an income tax because we have a tax called the income tax.
- 2y ago
- baq 2y agoThey are noise generators with a goal of raising the noise floor above the pain threshold, in essence they’re using free speech to shut down free speech itself.
- Retric 2y agoI’d say the same about social media. However IMO the value of free speech isn’t in having a clear message to directly improve things, the value is being able to steal ideas from anyone. “Obamacare” was originally a Republican idea, but once an idea is out there anyone can take it. Ideas don’t need to win on day one, if it takes 30 years that’s still plenty useful.