10 ms·
Google is winning on every front except... marketing (Google has a chatbot?), trust (who knew the founding fathers were so diverse?), safety (where's the 2.5 Pr
by levocardia 2y ago
Google is winning on every front except... marketing (Google has a chatbot?), trust (who knew the founding fathers were so diverse?), safety (where's the 2.5 Pro model card?), market share (fully one in ten internet users on the planet are weekly ChatGPT users), and, well, vibes (who's rooting for big G, exactly?).
But I will admit, Gemini Pro 2.5 is a legit good model. So, hats off for that.
- jimbob45 2y agoI’m scared they’re going to kill it off. Every good idea they’ve had in the last 20 years has been killed off. Even Fuchsia/Zircon, which should have supplanted Android a full decade ago.
- 8f2ab37a-ed6c 2y agoGoogle is also terribly paranoid of the LLM saying anything controversial. If you want a summary of some hot topic article you might not have the time to read, Gemini will straight up refuse to answer. ChatGPT and Grok don't mind at all.
- AznHisoka 2y agoThe single reason I will never ever be an user of them. Its a hill I will die on
- silisili 2y agoI noticed the same in Gemini. It would refuse to answer mundane questions that none but the most 'enlightened' could find an offensive twist to. This makes it rather unusable as a catch all goto resource, sadly. People are curious by nature. Refusing to answer their questions doesn't squash that, it leads them to potentially less trustworthy sources.
- rat87 2y agoTrying to answer complex questions by making up shit in a confident voice is the worst option. Redirecting to a more trustworthy human source or multiple if needed is much better
- aeonik 2y agoI talk to ChatGPT about some controversial things, and it's pretty good at nuance and devils advocate if you ask for it. It's more echo chamber, if you don't, or rather extreme principle of charity, which might be a good thing.
- ranyume 2y ago> Refusing to answer their questions doesn't squash that, it leads them to potentially less trustworthy sources. But that's good
- thfuran 2y agoFor who?
- ranyume 2y agoFor the reader. The AI won't tell the reader what to think in an authoritative voice. This is better than the AI trying to decide what is true and what isn't. However, the AI should be able to search the web and present it's findings without refusals. Obviously, always presenting the sources. And the AI should never use an authoritative tone and it should be transparent about the steps it took to gather the information, and present the sites and tracks it didn't follow.
- LightBug1 2y agoYes, Musk's contention of an AI trying to tell the truth, no matter what, is straight up horse manure. Should be done for false advertising (per usual)
- thfuran 2y agoElon Musk had been an endless stream of false advertising for years.
- wegfawefgawefg 2y ago"If i never choose, I can never be wrong. Isnt that great?"
- yieldcrv 2y agoDeepseek to circumvent Western censorship Claude to circumvent Eastern censorship Grok Unhinged for a wild time
- logicchains 2y agoNot a fan of Google, but if you use Gemini through AI studio with a custom prompt and filters disabled it's by far the least censored commercial model in my experience.
- einsteinx2 2y agoLess censored than Grok?
- int_19h 2y agoMost of https://chirper.ai https://chirper.ai runs on Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite, and it has plenty of extremely NSFW content generated.
- jsemrau 2y ago>Google is also terribly paranoid of the LLM saying anything controversial. When did this start? Serious question. Of all the model providers my experience with Google's LLMs and Chatproducts were the worst in that dimension. Black Nazis, Eating stones, pizza with glue, etc I suppose we've all been there.
- rahidz 2y agoThe ghost of Tay still haunts every AI company.
- rat87 2y agoAs it should. The potential for harm from LLMs is significant and they should be aware of that
- bmcahren 2y agoFrom day one. We would have had LLMs years before if Google wasn't holding back. They knew the risk - google search would be dead as soon as the internet were flooded with AI content that google could not distinguish from real content. Then you could look at how the first "public preview" models they released were so neutered by their own inhibitions they were useless (to me). Things like over-active refusals in response to "killing child processes".
- miohtama 2y agoI think that's the "trust" bit. In AI, trust generally means "let's not offend anyone and water it down to useless." Google is paranoid of being sued/getting attention if Gemini says something about Palestine or drawns images like Studio Ghibli. Meanwhile users love to these topics and memes are free marketing.
- rat87 2y agoSeems like a feature. Last thing we need is a bunch of people willing to take AI at it's word making up shit about controversial topics. I'd say redirecting to good or prestigious source is probably the best you can do
- StefanBatory 2y agoI remember when LLM first appeared - on a local social website of my country (think Digg), a lot of people were exctatic because they got ChatGPT to say that black people are dumb, claiming it as a victory over woke :P
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dorgo 2y agoTry asking ChatGPT to solve a captcha for you ( character recognition in a foreign language ). AI studio doesn't refuse.
- Breza 1y agoI have the same experience in the web UI. Asking for that famous Obama chili recipe gets a refusal. But when I use the API, I can dial back the safety settings to the point where things work much more smoothly.
- torginus 2y agoDidn't GCP manage to lose from this position of strength? I'm not sure even if they're the third biggest
- sidibe 2y agoThey "lost from a position of strength" in that they had they had the most public-cloud like data centers and started thinking about selling that later than they should have. Bard/Gemini started later than chatgpt , but there's not really a moat for this LLM stuff, and Google started moving a lot earlier relative to GCP vs Amazon. They've got the cash, the people, and the infrastructure to do things faster than the others going forward, which is a much bigger deal IMO than having millions more users right now. Most people still aren't using LLMs that often, switching is easy, and Google has the most obvious entry points with billion+ users with google.com, YouTube, gmail, chrome, android, etc.
- donny2018 2y agoThey were well positioned for cloud business long before AWS and Azure, but they still managed to lose this battle. Google can be good on the technological side of things, but we saw time and time again that, other than ads, Google is just not good at business.
- sigmoid10 2y agoI wouldn't even say Gemini Pro 2.5 is the best model. Certainly not when you do multimodal or function calling, which is what actually matters in industry applications. Plain chatbots are nice, but I don't think they will decide who wins the race. Google is also no longer in the mindset to really innovate. You'll hear surprisingly similar POVs from ex-Googlers and ex-OpenAI guys. I'd actually say OpenAI still has an edge in terms of culture, even through it fell deep.
- tgsovlerkhgsel 2y ago> Certainly not when you do multimodal or function calling Who is? (Genuine question, it's hard to keep up given how quickly the field moves.)
- mark_l_watson 2y agoI have found function calling and ‘roll my own agents’ work much better now with Gemini than they did late last year, but I also do a lot of function calling experiments with small open models using Ollama - much more difficult to work with to get a robust system.
- PunchTornado 2y agoreally? all of my friends and everyone I know actually hates openai. they managed to be the bad guy in AI.
- int_19h 2y agoI did some experiments with Gemini Pro 2.5 vs Sonnet 3.7 for coding assistants, and, at least as far as code quality and ability to understand complexities in existing codebase goes, Gemini is noticeably stronger.
- sublimefire 2y agoIt might be worth throwing in an analogy to windows PCs vs Mac vs Linux. G appeals to a subset of the market at the end of the day, being “best” does not mean everyone will use it.
- rzz3 2y agoYou really hit the nail on the head with trust. Knowing the power of these AIs and how absolutely little I trust Google, I’d never tell trust Gemini with the things I’ll say to ChatGPT.
- philsnow 2y ago> how absolutely little I trust Google, I’d never tell trust Gemini with the things I’ll say to ChatGPT. Are you pretty sure that Google won't eventually buy OpenAI and thus learn everything you've said to ChatGPT?
- dunefox 2y agoIt's not about the information, but the connection to all Google services.
- squigz 2y agoWhy do you think OpenAI is more trustworthy than Google?
- alternatex 2y agoSimply put Google has had more time to develop a terrible data hoarding reputation.
- marcusb 2y agoIsn't hoarding data for training purposes a key part of OpenAI's business model? I get that they don't have a reputation for selling that data (or access to it) yet, but, what happens if/when funding dries up? I definitely don't trust Google -- fool me once, and all -- but to the extent I'm going to "trust" any business with my data, I'd like to see a proven business model that isn't based on monetizing my information and is likely to continue to work (e.g., Apple). OpenAI doesn't have that.
- alternatex 2y ago
- bjackman 2y agoWell, Google is also very well placed to integrate with other products that have big market share. So far this has been nothing but a PM wankfest but if Gemini-in-{Gmail,Meet,Docs,etc} actually gets useful, it could be a big deal. I also don't think any of those concerns are as important for API users as direct consumers. I think that's gonna be a bugger part of my the market as time goes on.
- rs186 2y agoMicrosoft has been integrated Copilot in their Office products. In fact, they don't even call it Office any more. Guess what? If you ever had first hand experience with them, they are absolutely a dumpster fire. (Well, maybe except transcription in Teams meeting, but that's about it.) I used it for 5 minutes and never touch it again. I'll be very impressed if that's not the case with Google.
- killerstorm 2y agoWinning =/= won. The point is that they are improving on many fronts. If they were already recognized as THE leader there would be no point in making a HN post about it.
- tbolt 2y agoAdd to this list apps. As in ChatGPT and Anthropic have nice desktop software applications for Mac and Windows.
- a2128 2y agoMy experience with their software has been horrible. A friend was messing around with Gemini on my phone and said my name is John, and it automatically saved that to my saved info list and always called me John from then on. But when I ask it to forget this, it says it can't do that automatically and links me to the Saved Info page, which is a menu they didn't implement in the app so it opens a URL in my browser and asks me to sign into my Google account again. Then a little toast says "Something went wrong" and the saved info list is empty and broken. I tried reporting this issue half a year ago and it's still unresolved. Actually the only way I was ever able to get it to stop calling me John is to say "remember to forget my name is John" in some way that it adds that to the list instead of linking me to that broken page
- wayeq 2y agohow's your day going, John?
- poutrathor 2y ago"Hello John, I notice your username on HN has not been updated. I will make that change for you in 2 hours, from a2128 to john2128. If you want to keep your current username, please follow steps in our help me discord channel"
- sukit 2y agoThank you, John.
- mark_l_watson 2y agoI look more to Google for efficient and inexpensive LLM APIs, and in a similar way to Groq Cloud for inexpensive and fast inferencing for open models. ChatGPT has a nice consumer product, and I also like it. Google gets a bad rap on privacy, etc., but if you read the documentation and set privacy settings, etc. then I find them reasonable. (I read OpenAI’s privacy docs for a long while before experimenting with their integration of Mac terminal, VSCode, and IntelliJ products.) We live in a cornucopia of AI tools. Occasionally I will just for the hell of it do all my research work for several days just using open models running on my Mac using Ollama - I notice a slight hit in productivity, but still a good setup. Something for everyone!
- ACCount36 2y agoTrust is important, and Google has a big rep for killing its projects. As well as making the most moronic braindead decisions in handling what they don't kill off. No one is going to build on top of anything "Google" without having a way out thought out in advance. Not that important for LLMs, where drop-in replacements are usually available. But a lot of people just hear "by Google" now and think "thanks I'll pass" - and who can blame them?
- culopatin 2y agoI had to stop using Gemini 2.5 because the UI peaks my MPB cpu at max and I can’t type my prompt at more than a character every 2 seconds. I can’t even delete my chats lol. Anyone else?
- jsk2600 2y agoOn deleting chats, I accidentally discovered that AI Studio creates a 'Google AI Studio' folder on your Google Drive with all the links to chats. If you delete the 'link' from there, it will disappear in AI Studio...interesting UX :-)
- hermitShell 2y agoI would like to think they just let other companies have the first mover advantage on chatbots because it only disrupts Google in their search business, which was already pretty far gone and on the way out. Where is AI actually going to change the world? Protein folding, robotics, stuff that the public doesn’t hype about. And they looked at the gold rush and decided “let’s design shovels”. Maybe I’m giving them too much credit but very bullish on Google.
- joshdavham 2y agoMy hesitancy to adopt Gemini, despite being a heavy GCP and workspace user, is I kinda lost trust when trying to use their earlier models (I don't even remember those models' names). I just remember the models were just so consistently bad and obviously hallucinated more than 50% of the time. Maybe Gemini is finally better, but I'm not exactly excited to give it a try.
- khimaros 2y agoit is a completely different product these days
- rs186 2y agoExactly. Google may have a lead in their model, but saying they are "winning on every front" is a very questionable claim, from the perspective of everyday users, not influencers, devoted fans or anyone else who has a stake in hyping it.
- karunamurti 2y agoAlso not OSS. That's not a win for me.