4 ms·
I hate this comparison because it ignores the obvious important difference: humans aren’t owned by somebody. When models aren’t used commercially, they should b
by BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
I hate this comparison because it ignores the obvious important difference: humans aren’t owned by somebody. When models aren’t used commercially, they should be compared to people for copyright purposes. Its when their outputs are sold for profit that copyright should be applied to the seller of the outputs, eg openai.
- alganet 2y agoIn the intellectual realm, many humans are owned. Workers whose ideas belong to their hiring companies, for example. Predatory contracts that leave only the choice of starving versus being a mind slave are commonplace in industry. Idea production is claimed by masters, instead of workers, very often. The comparison is just a trick to make people talk about one thing while it means another.
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y agoI could disagree on technicalities, but yeah we more or less agree. I won't argue with you on that.