3 ms·
I think that's fair that's your position, as that's how you feel towards those people and them going into the same bathroom as you despite being opposite sex.
by jalapenos 2y ago
I think that's fair that's your position, as that's how you feel towards those people and them going into the same bathroom as you despite being opposite sex.
But why is it right that that position then be extended to be binding on third parties, like families with little girls who don't want growth men in their private spaces where they're getting changed, or to their daughters who want fair competition in their chosen sports?
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> families with little girls who don't want growth men in their private spaces where they're getting changed, or to their daughters who want fair competition in their chosen sports? They…can go somewhere else? Like, there are religions in which a man can’t sit next to a woman on a plane. That’s sort of on them to deal with. Not society.
- jalapenos 2y agoI suppose that's the point - they were here first. So it's the radicals who should go somewhere else, and leave normal, mentally healthy people be.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> leave normal, mentally healthy people be We have reams of studies on the mental health of Swedes and Japanese, on one hand, and religiously-conservative Americans, on the other hand. The parents of kids freaking out about seeing a penis aren’t on the stable end.
- aaaja 2y ago[flagged]