> They are heavily armed, yet they have very low rates of gun violence Citation needed. Per capita, those in rural areas are more likely to die from suicide by

> They are heavily armed, yet they have very low rates of gun violence Citation needed. Per capita, those in rural areas are more likely to die from suicide by gun than urbanites from gun homicide. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2804113 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/280... > The issues are social and cultural and are not something that a gun ban will solve. Citation needed. Where have gun bans failed and why? Mexico, central, and South America, primarily because it’s so easy to obtain weapons in the U.S. and smuggle them down. > There will at best be no cooperation with forced confiscation, and most likely there will be active resistance against such a tyrannical incursion upon the rights of free people. Citation needed. There are absolutely nut jobs that won’t follow the law, but that’s true of any law. The solution isn’t to not pass laws. These folks will be dealt with like any other criminal. You make a lot of assertions that seem to stand up to even the tiniest bit of scrutiny. You don’t back any of it up with any data.