3 ms·
That was the most interesting point for me too. Mobile development has reminded me of the significant tooling benefits of static languages but also the verbosit
by cageface 14y ago
That was the most interesting point for me too. Mobile development has reminded me of the significant tooling benefits of static languages but also the verbosity and awkwardness of said languages. If I could have an IntelliJ-level IDE for Ruby or Python or JS I'd be very happy.
- rabbitfang 14y agoIf I could have an IntelliJ-level IDE for Ruby or Python or JS I'd be very happy. The company behind IntelliJ already makes IDEs for Ruby, Python and JS: Python: Pycharm http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/ http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/ Ruby: RubyMine http://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/ http://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/ JS: Webstorm http://www.jetbrains.com/webstorm/ http://www.jetbrains.com/webstorm/
- cageface 14y agoI was a rubymine customer for 1.0 and it's good but nothing like intellij is for java. Static typing just makes building good tools so much easier.