4 ms·
WordPress.com launches would be a better title. This builder is not available in WordPress (the open source software) but only WordPress.com (a hosting company
by rustc 1y ago
WordPress.com launches would be a better title. This builder is not available in WordPress (the open source software) but only WordPress.com (a hosting company owned by the creator of WordPress).
For a moment I thought they added AI integration to the open source Gutenberg plugin.
- throwawaymatt 1y agoA very important distinction indeed. Wordpress.COM is not the same as the self-hosted version at WordPress.ORG While they've made recent changes to .COM to bring it closer to .ORG mostly as a knee-jerk response to the Matt v WPE scrap, they are still very different experiences. I rarely advise clients looking to DIY solution to go to WordPress.com
- pluc 1y agoIt's funny that the whole lawsuit thing started because Mullenweg was claiming wpengine was confusing customers, when .com and .org is way more confusing.
- webspinner 1y agoI keep them straight usually. However, I don't have to. I just use Classic press.
- webspinner 1y agoVery true! Oh and I would hope not.
- dang 1y agoSince wordpress.com is displayed next to the title above, we can fix this by reverting the submission title to that of the article. I've done that now. (Well, I used the minimally baity substring.) (Submitted title was "WordPress launches new free AI website builder")