Your original argument was that an algorithm cannot be bad, and now you are countering my point by arguing that the algorithm is bad if it ignores your rights,

Your original argument was that an algorithm cannot be bad, and now you are countering my point by arguing that the algorithm is bad if it ignores your rights, is solely responsible for the implemented outcome and doesn’t include any input for human review or appeal. Funny enough I read not that long ago about a case where an algorithm broke all those three points! Can’t remember where of the top of my mind, I think it was the Louisiana Prison board or something like that. But never mind that, you are arguing against yourself so I’ll kindly step aside and let you at you.