3 ms·
They do though— it's mostly because the pros aren't terribly good either. If your standards are "the top 0.001%" of graphic and web design then yeah, AI designs
by Spivak 2y ago
They do though— it's mostly because the pros aren't terribly good either. If your standards are "the top 0.001%"
of graphic and web design then yeah, AI designs aren't on the level. But if your standards are simply as good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm then AI is knocking it out of the park.
- rrr_oh_man 2y ago> good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm Can you give me one example of a decent logo design made by ChatGPT that does exactly that — look good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm? I have literally tried today, but the results have been... very meh. :)
- Spivak 2y agoThat's no fun. Instead let's play a game. One of these logos was made by a professional design firm and cost over $1,000,000. The other two I just generated. The gap between well-known national brands with millions of dollars to hire the best and what normal companies actually get is massive. https://imgur.com/a/5En58cl https://imgur.com/a/5En58cl
- rrr_oh_man 2y agoThey are all pretty terrible, but I guess the rhombus-caret one is real. The stripes one is rounded (looks shit when small), the complicated one is complicated for no reason. Good logos work when black-and-white and when very small or very large. And one more thing: The high cost of a rebrand isn’t paid for the logo or the redesign of stationary. It’s for the pain & process of aligning a committee of aloof decision-makers around a single choice.