4 ms·

If you have GPT pro or know someone try it out .. create a logo with it then ask it to create a website around your chosen logo and then ask it to code the fron

If you have GPT pro or know someone try it out .. create a logo with it then ask it to create a website around your chosen logo and then ask it to code the front-end. Im sure it can do the back-end code too. The logos and the web design it creates around the chosen logo look amazing .. extremely pro level. I'm not sure how you or anyone would be able to decipher if a website and or brand used chatGPT (pro). I'm betting no one would be able to tell just that it looks really good to great and professional! Personally it's a wake up call for my skill-sets of over 15 years and that increasing my skillsets to 2025 modern day skill sets is best thing for me and any in my field!

rrr_oh_man 2y ago
> The logos and the web design it creates around the chosen logo look amazing .. extremely pro level Loss of words. I'd be happy to have your standards in life.
- Spivak 2y ago
  They do though— it's mostly because the pros aren't terribly good either. If your standards are "the top 0.001%" of graphic and web design then yeah, AI designs aren't on the level. But if your standards are simply as good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm then AI is knocking it out of the park.
  - rrr_oh_man 2y ago
    > good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm Can you give me one example of a decent logo design made by ChatGPT that does exactly that — look good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm? I have literally tried today, but the results have been... very meh. :)
    - Spivak 2y ago
      That's no fun. Instead let's play a game. One of these logos was made by a professional design firm and cost over $1,000,000. The other two I just generated. The gap between well-known national brands with millions of dollars to hire the best and what normal companies actually get is massive. https://imgur.com/a/5En58cl https://imgur.com/a/5En58cl
      - rrr_oh_man 2y ago
        They are all pretty terrible, but I guess the rhombus-caret one is real. The stripes one is rounded (looks shit when small), the complicated one is complicated for no reason. Good logos work when black-and-white and when very small or very large. And one more thing: The high cost of a rebrand isn’t paid for the logo or the redesign of stationary. It’s for the pain & process of aligning a committee of aloof decision-makers around a single choice.
- cyral 2y ago
  The new image generation released two weeks ago or so is a massive improvement, doesn't look like typical AI slop. Everyone in these threads that dismisses AI needs to remember 5 years ago we didn't have somewhat human level intelligence that we could command to complete tasks in 30 seconds. There are a lot of cases where it fails right now, but imagine what it's going to look like in 5 or 10 more years. I think it's good to at least play around with it (prompt experimenting) to see what it can do, because your competitors, coworkers, etc are going to do that and get ahead whether you like it or not.
ToucanLoucan 2y ago
I will Pepsi challenge this at your convenience. Give me some links if you like.

rrr_oh_man 2y ago

> The logos and the web design it creates around the chosen logo look amazing .. extremely pro level Loss of words. I'd be happy to have your standards in life.

Spivak 2y ago
They do though— it's mostly because the pros aren't terribly good either. If your standards are "the top 0.001%" of graphic and web design then yeah, AI designs aren't on the level. But if your standards are simply as good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm then AI is knocking it out of the park.
- rrr_oh_man 2y ago
  > good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm Can you give me one example of a decent logo design made by ChatGPT that does exactly that — look good or better than your typical professional design consulting firm? I have literally tried today, but the results have been... very meh. :)
  - Spivak 2y ago
    That's no fun. Instead let's play a game. One of these logos was made by a professional design firm and cost over $1,000,000. The other two I just generated. The gap between well-known national brands with millions of dollars to hire the best and what normal companies actually get is massive. https://imgur.com/a/5En58cl https://imgur.com/a/5En58cl
    - rrr_oh_man 2y ago
      They are all pretty terrible, but I guess the rhombus-caret one is real. The stripes one is rounded (looks shit when small), the complicated one is complicated for no reason. Good logos work when black-and-white and when very small or very large. And one more thing: The high cost of a rebrand isn’t paid for the logo or the redesign of stationary. It’s for the pain & process of aligning a committee of aloof decision-makers around a single choice.
cyral 2y ago
The new image generation released two weeks ago or so is a massive improvement, doesn't look like typical AI slop. Everyone in these threads that dismisses AI needs to remember 5 years ago we didn't have somewhat human level intelligence that we could command to complete tasks in 30 seconds. There are a lot of cases where it fails right now, but imagine what it's going to look like in 5 or 10 more years. I think it's good to at least play around with it (prompt experimenting) to see what it can do, because your competitors, coworkers, etc are going to do that and get ahead whether you like it or not.

ToucanLoucan 2y ago

I will Pepsi challenge this at your convenience. Give me some links if you like.