4 ms·
I'll join you in getting downvoted for absolutely no reason. It's a shitty thing they're doing, but your observation is correct. My job working on NIH-funded re
by karaterobot 2y ago
I'll join you in getting downvoted for absolutely no reason. It's a shitty thing they're doing, but your observation is correct. My job working on NIH-funded research projects is directly in their path, so I wish they weren't stomping a mudhole across science and technology. But they are, and, as you note, they're doing it very effectively and with incredible speed.
If it's outside our capability as a community to even acknowledge that they're moving fast, how can we note that they're moving way too fast to be doing it right?
- lazide 2y agoBut they are doing it right - by their metric. Which is not the one others want them to be using.
- karaterobot 2y agoBy their own metrics, sure, maybe. I don't actually know what the real measurement of success is for them. But, to clarify, I didn't mean doing it right by their metric, I meant in my estimation, or [gestures broadly] our estimation.
- lazide 2y agoThe crux of the issue IMO, is to quote, ‘what do you mean “we” kemo sabe?’ I bet on any particular issue you can find 3-4 major groups with conflicting opinions.