3 ms·
Regarding "what else has to happen": I would say something catastrophic. Nothing comes to mind recently. Security is good, but occasionally I wonder if technic
by vladms 2y ago
Regarding "what else has to happen": I would say something catastrophic. Nothing comes to mind recently.
Security is good, but occasionally I wonder if technical people don't imagine fantastic scenarios of evil masterminds doing something with the data and manage to rule the world.
While in reality, at least the last 5 years there are so many leaders (and people) doing and saying so plainly stupid that I feel we should be more afraid of stupid people than of hackers.
- bluGill 2y agoIn the last 5 years several major medical providers have had sensitive person data of nearly everyone compromised. The political leaders are biggest problem today, but that could change again.
- vladms 2y agoAnd what is the actual impact? Don't get me wrong, I don't think it is not bad, but then again abusing information could be done already by the said providers (ex: hike insurance rates based on previous conditions, taking advantage of vulnerable people). Society works by agreements and laws, not by (absolute) secrecy. There are of course instances like electrical grid stopping for days, people being killed remotely in hospitals, nuclear plants exploding, that would have a different impact and we might get there, just that it did not happen yet.
- Tijdreiziger 2y agoThe actual impact is that your private medical data is in the hands of thieves, which most people don’t want. It’s similar to how most people are distressed after a break-in, because they considered their home to be a private space, even though the lock manufacturer never claimed 100% security (or the thieves simply bypassed the locks by smashing a window). Agreements and laws don’t solve that problem, because thieves already aren’t stopped by those.