In practice it seemed more lazy than illuminating. 30 hours of interviews of even the most fascinating person yields a fraction of useful material. Which in tur

In practice it seemed more lazy than illuminating. 30 hours of interviews of even the most fascinating person yields a fraction of useful material. Which in turn needs research and context to communicate in visual form. Likewise I'm glad Eno found a way to fund 500 hours of digitization of ephemera but again it needs to be curated, not put into an ffmpeg script.