This article isn't criticizing LLMs if that's the point of your comment seems like you missed the point of the article (or didn't actual read it). The TL;DR of

This article isn't criticizing LLMs if that's the point of your comment seems like you missed the point of the article (or didn't actual read it). The TL;DR of it is the last paragraph that says > Anyone who is telling you criticism slots into “real” or “fake” or “sucks” or “dangerous” is at best a useful idiot desperate for a comforting narrative that’ll provide some phony comfort. If you’re interested in understanding the world, ignore such fools.