I have found Gemini 2.5 Pro works really well on python math or science based prompts, where you for instance need to generate a notebook or get some scaffoldin

I have found Gemini 2.5 Pro works really well on python math or science based prompts, where you for instance need to generate a notebook or get some scaffolding code up for a problem you're exploring. However, it hasn't replaced Claude 3.7 thinking for day to day coding tasks. Most notable at least in my experience, Gemini 2.5 Pro works terribly on existing code. It will often produce changes to areas of the code I never asked it to, requiring careful review. Sometimes when Claude has failed to fix a bug repeatedly, I'll try to use Gemini 2.5 Pro. Still a hit or miss, and several times I've gone back to Claude and found the right solution with more and varied prompting or work on adding context. One thing I have noticed is that Gemini 2.5 Pro works a lot better using Google's AI console than through VS Code or Cursor (you can get it working with the latest Insiders build for VSCode). You can also see its chain of thought, which often times gives insight that can be used in additional prompting. Still, though, at least for my type of work, Gemini 2.5 Pro hasn't replaced Claude for me quite yet.