2 ms·
Yes, because if there's one thing computer vision solutions have historically had trouble with, it's being fooled by paint. The ludditism in this thread is sho
by ajross 2y ago
Yes, because if there's one thing computer vision solutions have historically had trouble with, it's being fooled by paint. The ludditism in this thread is shockingly strong.
- itishappy 2y agoCV systems absolutely do struggle with this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1MigIJXJx8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1MigIJXJx8
- ajross 2y agoYes, and that's considered a bug to fix, and can be. CV systems are widely applied to find camouflaged and obscured objects! Literally every automated wildlife camera is proof that this is a silly point.
- itishappy 2y agoCall it whatever you want, lack of contrast is a physical constraint on your system and can be trivially leveraged. There's been an arms race between optical camouflage and detectors for the entire history of eyes. It's not necessarily a game ender, but it's not something you can just wave away either.