5 ms·
Playing devil's advocate: If the allegations about Meta violating laws in the book are true, what would be an appropriate waiting period before the author testi
by MeetingsBrowser 2y ago
Playing devil's advocate: If the allegations about Meta violating laws in the book are true, what would be an appropriate waiting period before the author testifies to the Senate, so that it doesn't appear to be a PR tour?
- trhway 2y agoA negative value, about -7 years in this case.
- loeg 2y agoShe could have raised her concerns in 2017 or earlier, rather than 2025, when her knowledge is eight years out of date.
- cookiengineer 2y agoNot sure why you are writing this bad faith argument. Not a single legal system on the planet is that fast. All class action law suits take years of preparation time in their discovery phase.
- loeg 2y agoWhat about this do you think is constrained to the legal system? Her book and the senate hearing are not moving through or constrained by the ordinary courts. (And while they're slow, they do generally move faster than eight years.)
- mrguyorama 2y agoGod forbid we hold a corporation to account for what they did several years ago. Nope, if you can't convince CNN to carry your story the moment it happens, it's clearly not worth doing any law stuff about.
- loeg 2y agoIf it wasn't an interesting story in 2017, I don't think it's an interesting story now. You can disagree; that's fine.