3 ms·
Very cool, keep it up. Always good to see innovations, creativity and curiosity in the database space.
by alexpadula 2y ago
Very cool, keep it up. Always good to see innovations, creativity and curiosity in the database space.
- alexpadula 2y agoOne question I have is what is the plan on implementing full SQL? I see currently you're only implementing maybe 15% of SQL92. Are you implementing your own SQL-like language?
- alexpadula 2y agoAnother few pieces here listening to your video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzDnA_EVhTU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzDnA_EVhTU You mention it runs in process? How does this occur? You mention running cached in memory tables. So you're caching on at the application level, not the storage level? There's a few things with the video I find misleading. You mention 400ms at best to parse, plan and execute a query; That's not true, what about the type of query, etc. Overall I can see it's still early, which is ok. I will review the code and see what else I can find.
- alexpadula 2y agoOne more question I have is how are you handling the cluster architecture. I don't see that on the website. You mention on the pricing a cluster and replication but scaling horizontally is rather important and we definitely want to know how you're achieving scalability.