> If you read the introduction, it points out that this is not really a substitute for Dan's underlying talk (which is linked/embedded), but merely an addendum

> If you read the introduction, it points out that this is not really a substitute for Dan's underlying talk (which is linked/embedded), but merely an addendum of notes for it. The talk is quite digestible imho. Thanks, I must have skipped that part. It's hard for me to sit down watch 30 minutes of a video, so I like reading text more, but I will try to watch it tomorrow.