3 ms·

I really like Claude and have the money to spend on something like this if I wanted to but it's not compelling at all. No new models, no new capabilities, just

I really like Claude and have the money to spend on something like this if I wanted to but it's not compelling at all. No new models, no new capabilities, just higher limits. Which I know some people are asking/begging for but that's not been an issue for me. If I needed more I'd probably use the API. I only continue to pay because some of the features in Claude Web are better than what I've seen elsewhere but their latest web redesign is making me seriously reconsider that stance. It's /bad/, breaks scrolling while it's generating a response, break copy/paste/selection, etc. It's incredibly hostile and I have to assume anyone seriously using Claude internally is using a different client.

gwd 2y ago
> If I needed more I'd probably use the API. The API gets overloaded and you get blocked out as well; yesterday I had to go look up a bunch of bash runes on stackoverflow because Claude's API was busy in the one day a year* I happened to be writing bash scripts. (Maybe I should have tried out Gemini for a change.) Part of the promise here isn't just usage, but priority: you pay your $200/mo, and (I presume) you never have to worry about being locked out. * This is an exaggeration but not much of one
- attentive 2y ago
  you can use sonnet3.7 on aws or gcloud and you shouldn't hit any reasonable limits