4 ms·
It's lacking. A good title should save a click for those who are not interested in details but just the conclusion.
by zerr 2y ago
It's lacking. A good title should save a click for those who are not interested in details but just the conclusion.
- bookofjoe 2y agoI ask again: what do you believe the title should be?
- esperent 2y agoIt's a scientific study. It's conclusion is the study results which is a bunch of confidence intervals and statistics. Someone else quoted this as the results from the study: > For the primary comparison of any vitamin D versus placebo, the intervention did not statistically significantly affect overall ARI risk (OR 0·94 [95% CI 0·88–1·00], p=0·057; 40 studies; 61 589 participants; I2=26·4%). Are you suggesting that should be in the title? Would it even fit?
- brokegrammer 2y agoThen the title could be "Meta analysis finds Vitamin D supplementation doesn't improve Acute Respiratory Illness" or some variation of that, which is something I've known about Vitamin D for a while.
- bookofjoe 2y ago"7 too long"