3 ms·
Can you point to a single example of CF doing this to a legitimate entity that wasn't obviously abusing their plan? Every time this comes up it's always some sh
by tomnipotent 2y ago
Can you point to a single example of CF doing this to a legitimate entity that wasn't obviously abusing their plan? Every time this comes up it's always some shady website that's getting the limited treatment.
And it's not "unlimited bandwidth", it's "unlimited bandwidth with restrictions". That's an important and critical distinction. I'm not sure I understand the position that somehow CF needs to subsidize every customer.
- webstrand 2y agoNobody said CF needs to subsidize every customer. The rules need to be clear though, not secret. Same with anthropic's usage limits, since they're not public they can degrade the service you're paying for at any point in time with no notice.
- tomnipotent 2y agoI'd much rather have "unlimited" bandwidth with restrictions and the current ambiguous enforcement than clearly defined limits and strict enforcement which penalizes all customers. The current model benefits considerably more people than the alternative.
- Veen 2y agoThe oxymoronic style of marketing bullshit: unlimited with restrictions, free but only if you pay, lifetime membership for three years, etc.