3 ms·
At last. I honestly think the product engineering org at Anthropic has serious issues. They are slow to ship, and quality of the webapp has been decidedly mixed
by smallerfish 2y ago
At last. I honestly think the product engineering org at Anthropic has serious issues. They are slow to ship, and quality of the webapp has been decidedly mixed in the past 6 months. Some of the UX decisions they've made are bone-headed.
(OpenAI launched their pro plan 4 months ago!)
- bastardoperator 2y agoI just assumed most people at this point are using a client.
- tener 2y agoIt is hardly better though. Aside from MCP support (with rather poor UX, just compare it with anything else out there) it really has nothing to offer.
- bastardoperator 2y agoI've been satisfied with msty and code/cursor.
- yieldcrv 2y agoI actually like Claude over ChatGPT specifically because of how their web UI distinguishes. Its clear that neither company prioritizes their flagship chat UI, over their other offerings. So if it will be in stasis, I definitely like it There are other web AI offerings now (deepseek web, perplexity, to name a few). This is what I like between these two: The speed of responses. The reliability. ChatGPT web UI often times out or has server errors for random things. Different censorship. Overall better for my use cases, and how errors are handled. Initially search of old chats was a first class citizen in Claude. ChatGPT didnt have it, needed third party plugins, it has since updated, but is still lackluster in this regard. The diagrams, charting and coding interface is great and better. Easier for seeing how something compiles and runs, easier to copy and paste.