> is still same No it’s not the same. But at this point I’m pretty sure you don’t understand the concept of nuance. Sure, 10 vs 0 years is obvious. Why even b

> is still same No it’s not the same. But at this point I’m pretty sure you don’t understand the concept of nuance. Sure, 10 vs 0 years is obvious. Why even bring up such an example? What about 7 vs 10 or 3 vs 5? Maybe it’s technically lying but who cares if it works out at the end? What do these numbers even mean? A person who has 3 years of experience in Java can be better than someone who technically has 5.. Especially when those N years requirements are not necessarily put in there by the people who you’re actually going to work in.