3 ms·
More like the author was lazy and not thinking about correct ordering of the date there. It should absolutely be yyyy-mm-dd. I'll be updating the post w/ feedba
by trotter_cashion 14y ago
More like the author was lazy and not thinking about correct ordering of the date there. It should absolutely be yyyy-mm-dd. I'll be updating the post w/ feedback from the comments sometime today or tomorrow. So expect to see that change.
- harshreality 14y agoPlease also use a T between date and time parts, per the standard. Making stuff up requires everyone parsing your timestamps to use custom parsing.