3 ms·
He only has the ability to enact tariffs in an emergency, which he claims is the case, because "fentanyl", but probably will not live up to legal scrutiny. The
by outside1234 2y ago
He only has the ability to enact tariffs in an emergency, which he claims is the case, because "fentanyl", but probably will not live up to legal scrutiny.
The challenge of course, is that it takes a lot of time to legally challenge it, and in the meantime, we have this chaos.
This is why choosing a moral, steady, wise leader is important. The system can't keep up with the alternative.
- miketery 2y agoThe conclusion shouldn’t be about choosing a wise or moral leader, that’s an unknown and not a guarantee whether someone will remain wise. The conclusion ought to be that the executive shouldn’t have such powers. DOGE is also an example of this. No clue whether for the better or worse. But the mechanism being used was put in place by Obama during affordable care act overhauls, as part of USDS (US digital services).
- acdha 2y agoWhat DOGE is doing is far beyond what Obama’s USDS was empowered to do, and in many cases appears to violate statute.