4 ms·
I don't understand the negativity being shown towards TextMate in this thread. This thread is about an extremely popular editor going open source, something peo
by willurd 14y ago
I don't understand the negativity being shown towards TextMate in this thread. This thread is about an extremely popular editor going open source, something people have been asking for for a long time and something we should all be THRILLED about, regardless of whether we use it.
Can we save the editor wars for another thread and maybe, just maybe, actually talk about the code?
- 0x09 14y agoI'm personally super excited. Ever since reading this[1] blog post I've wanted to cobble together an editor with some level of libclang integration, but the amount of wheel reinvention involved kept it an idle idea. As a TM user already, having the codebase available is way more than I could've asked for. [1] http://etoileos.com/news/archive/2010/10/15/1401/ http://etoileos.com/news/archive/2010/10/15/1401/
- clinth 14y agoLike you said, I don't think it has to do with the open-sourcing per se. The open sourcing is good news. I'm not a TextMate user, but from what I've seen, this is confirmation that the TextMate author isn't going to release TM2 even though he advertised it as an incentive to buy TM1 several years ago, and has subsequently continued to promise.